(Case C-211/19 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 6March 2019— UO v Készenléti Rendőrség

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 6March 2019— UO v Készenléti Rendőrség

(Case C-211/19)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UO

Defendant: Készenléti Rendőrség

Questions referred

Must Article1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time¹ be interpreted as meaning that the scope ratione personae of that directive is determined by Article2 of Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work?²

If so, must Article2(2) of Directive 89/391/EEC on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work be interpreted as meaning that Article2(1) and (2) of [Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time] is not to be applied to police officers who are members of the professional staff of the Rapid Intervention Police?

____________

¹ Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L299, p.9).² OJ 1989 L183, p.1.