(Case C-213/18 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma (Italy) lodged on 26March 2018— Adriano Guaitoli and Others v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
Fecha: 01-Feb-2004
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma (Italy) lodged on 26March 2018— Adriano Guaitoli and Others v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
(Case C-213/18)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Tribunale ordinario di Roma
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Adriano Guaitoli, Concepción Casan Rodriguez, Alessandro Celano Tomassoni, Antonia Cirilli, Lucia Cortini, Mario Giuli, Patrizia Padroni
Defendant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
Questions referred
If a party whose flight has been delayed or cancelled jointly requests, not only the standardised and lump-sum compensation provided for by Articles5, 7 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No261/2004,1 but also the further compensation referred to in Article12 of the Regulation, must Article33 of the Montreal Convention apply, or is ‘jurisdiction’ (both international and local) governed by Article5 of Regulation (EC) No44/2001?2
In the first hypothesis in question 1, must Article33 of the Montreal Convention be interpreted to the effect that it governs only the allocation of jurisdiction among the States Parties, or as meaning that it also governs local jurisdiction within the individual State?
In the first hypothesis in question 2, is the application of Article33 of the Montreal Convention ‘exclusive’, precluding application of Article5 of Regulation (EC) No44/2001, or may the two provisions be applied jointly, so as to determine directly both the jurisdiction of the State and the local jurisdiction of its courts?