Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 – Hârsulescu v Romania
(Case C-374/09 P)
Appeal – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to examine an action seeking annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act – Appeal manifestly unfounded
Procedure – Action brought by a natural or legal person for annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act – Community judicature manifestly lacking jurisdiction (Art. 225 EC et seq. and Art. 140a EA et seq.; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 119) (see paras 7-9, 12)
Re:
| Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 22 July 2009 in Case T-234/09 | Hârsulescu | v | Romania | in which the Court of First Instance held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the applicant’s action for the annulment of two judgments given by national courts and for damages – Challenge to the method of calculating retirement pension rights – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court. |
Operative part:
1. |
| The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
| Mr Hârsulescu is ordered to pay the costs. |