Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2010 – Seacid v Parliament and Council
(Case C-266/10 P)
Appeal – Directive 2000/35/EC – Action for partial annulment – Application brought out of time – Appeal clearly unfounded
1.Procedure – Decision taken by way of reasoned order – Conditions – Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly lacking any foundation in law (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 2(2), 18, 19, 24(6) and 111) (see paras 11-18)
2.Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Point from which time starts to run – Date of publication of the measure at issue – Calculation (Art. 230, fifth para., EC; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 17 and 47; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1)) (see paras 25-27, 30)
Re:
| Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 March 2010 in Case T-530/09 | Seacid | v | Parliament and Council | , by which the Court dismissed an action for annulment of the last sentence of Article 5(1) of Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (OJ 2000 L 200, p.35) – Time‑limits for bringing proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility. |
Operative part
1. |
| The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
| Sistemul electronic de arhivare, criptare și indexare digitalizată Srl (Seacid) is ordered to bear its own costs. |