Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24January 2013— Enviro Tech Europe v Commission
(Case C‑118/12 P)
Appeal — Directives 67/548/EEC and 2004/73/EC — Classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances — Classification of n-propyl-bromide
1.Appeals — Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded — Rejection at any point by reasoned order without an oral procedure (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181) (see para. 22)
2.Appeals — Grounds — Challenge to the General Court’s interpretation of a judgment of the Court of Justice — Clearly unfounded ground of appeal (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181) (see paras 34-39)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16December 2011 in Case T‑291/04 | Enviro Tech Europe Ltd and Enviro Tech International, Inc. | v | Commission | by which the General Court dismissed an action for (i) annulment in part of Commission Directive 2004/73/EC of 29April 2004 adapting to technical progress for the twenty-ninth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ 2004 L152, p.1), in so far as it classifies n-propyl-bromide as a ‘highly flammable’ substance, and for (ii) damages for the loss which the applicants claim they sustained— Legal interest in bringing proceedings— Lack of individual concern |
Operative part
1. |
| The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
| Enviro Tech Europe Ltd is ordered to pay the costs. |