Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17January 2013— Verenigde Douaneagenten v Commission
(Case C‑173/12 P)
Appeal — Article220(2) of the Customs Code — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Incorrect presentation of the facts — Import of raw cane sugar
1.Appeals — Grounds — Erroneous assessment of the facts — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of Justice of the assessment of the facts put before the General Court — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 26, 27, 38, 39, 43, 44, 47, 48)
2.Appeals — Grounds — Ground lacking precision — Inadmissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 168(1)) (see para. 33)
Re:
| Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10February 2012 in Case T‑32/11 | Verenigde Douaneagenten | v | Commission | , by which the General Court dismissed in part the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1October 2010 finding that there should be post clearance recovery of import duties and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (REC 02/09). |
Operative part
1. |
| The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
| Verenigde Douaneagenten BV is ordered to pay the costs. |