Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13January 2015—
Asos v OHIM
(Case C‑320/14 P)
Appeal— Community trade mark— Word mark ASOS— Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark ASSOS— Partial refusal to register— Assessment of the facts and evidence by the General Court of the European Union— Challenge— Distortion of the facts or evidence— No distortion— Appeal manifestly inadmissible
1.Appeals— Grounds— Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence— Inadmissibility— Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence— Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 19)
2.Appeals—Grounds— Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance— Error of law relied on not identified— Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paras 25, 26)
3.Appeals— Grounds— Inadequate statement of reasons— Reliance by the Court of First Instance on implied reasoning— Lawfulness— Conditions (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.) (see para. 36)
Operative part
1. |
| The appeal is dismissed; |
2. |
| Asos plc is ordered to bear its own costs. |