(Case C-668/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 8November 2021– SIA Druvnieks v Lauku atbalsta dienests
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea

(Case C-668/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 8November 2021– SIA Druvnieks v Lauku atbalsta dienests

Fecha: 08-Nov-2021

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 8November 2021– SIA Druvnieks v Lauku atbalsta dienests

(Case C-668/21)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant: SIA Druvnieks

Other party in the appeal proceedings: Lauku atbalsta dienests

Questions referred

Is the application of Article60 of Regulation (EU) No1306/20131 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy justified where an undertaking owned by the proprietor of the company applying for aid, which is distinct from the latter, has committed an irregularity the financial consequences of which have not been rectified and the company applying for aid has taken over that undertaking’s agricultural business?

Is it possible to apply Article60 of Regulation (EU) No1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy in such a way that a person is found to have circumvented the administrative penalty provided for in Article64(4)(d) of that regulation, despite the fact that, in respect of the applicant company or its proprietor, no decision has been adopted imposing on it an administrative penalty resulting in its exclusion from eligibility for the aid?

Is it possible to apply Article60 of Regulation (EU) No1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17December 2013 in such a way that the authority responsible for examination of the project proposal must verify whether other undertakings previously owned by the proprietor of the company applying for aid satisfy the provisions of Article2(14) of Commission Regulation (EU) No702/2014 of 25June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles107 and 1081 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and, if the conditions are not fulfilled, reject the project proposal without an additional individual assessment of the factual circumstances?

____________

1 Regulation (EU) No1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No352/78, (EC) No165/94, (EC) No2799/98, (EC) No814/2000, (EC) No1290/2005 and (EC) No485/2008 (OJ 2013 L347, p.549).1 OJ 2014 L 193, p. 1.
Vista, DOCUMENTO COMPLETO