![BL-2020-001417 - [2025] EWHC 2487 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png){kind=logo}
Error al cargar el documento
- Heading
- MR JUSTICE FREEDMAN
- II Background to the issues
- III The issues
- IV The evidence
- V The facts
- VI The approaches to The Observatory and LGT
- VII Is the unjust enrichment by reference to services or end-product?
- VIII The rate of remuneration: fixed fee or commission?
- IX Limitation: are the claims wholly or in part statute barred?
- X The action to recover commission relating to the management fees in respect of The Observatory/2B and LBT/Crown
- XI The action to recover commission relating to the performance fees in respect
- XII Counter restitution
- XIII Alternative analysis about the value of any benefit received at the expense of Matrix in respect of a share of performance fees
- XIV The wrong party defences
- XV Wrong party first point: the assignment fails because any services were performed by MAAM or a Matrix entity other than MMM
- XVI Wrong party second point: the claim was transferred to LGBR or some other entity so that the assignment of MMM to MRL was ineffective
- Conclusions