Testing of Gowns
Testing of Gowns
Over the course of 2022, DHSC procured sterility testing on 120 gowns from Swann-Morton (Microbiological Laboratory Services) Limited (“Swann-Morton”) and 20 of the gowns from Synergy Health Ireland trading as Steris Laboratory Tullamore (“Steris”).
On 27 April 2022, 6, 15 and 22 June 2022, as well as 12 and 22 September 2022, Swann-Morton test result certificates for the anaerobic sterility testing were obtained. Further test certificates were obtained by Swann-Morton on 6 (on which date there were two) and 13 October 2022. On 30 May 2022, DHSC sent a further letter to Medpro explaining that “As part of broader testing of PPE products that DHSC has been unable to use, DHSC commissioned sterility testing of a sample of PPE Medpro gowns by Swann-Morton (Microbiological Laboratory Services) Limited”. The letter set out some preliminary test findings showing that 26/30 gowns were not sterile. The letter identified further breaches of the Contract in light of that evidence.
The first tranche of 60 gowns tested by Swann-Morton between April and June 2022 resulted in 26 out of 30 gowns failing the aerobic test and 29 out of 30 gowns failing the anaerobic test. The second tranche of 60 gowns tested between August and October 2022 resulted in 26 out of 30 gowns failing the aerobic test and 22 out of 30 gowns failing the anaerobic test.
Microbes were isolated from these tests and sent to another laboratory (“Charles River”) for detailed microbiological identification. On 11 July 2022, Charles River Associated provided the first tranche of the results of their microbiological testing, and on 13 October the second tranche.
A third lab, Steris, also carried out (less detailed) microbiological identification between 23 and 30 November 2022. Their certificate was issued on 15 December 2022. The sample for the microbiological identification test report was received on 22 December 2022, and approved on 13 January 2023. Of those 20 gowns, 19 were found to be not sterile.
- Heading
- This judgment was handed down by the court in person and by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and released to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be
- Sterility 101: An Introduction to sterility and Medical Device Law
- ISO 11137: Requirements of a Sterilisation Process
- Sterility level: EN 556
- Medical devices: MD Directive and MDR 2002
- Other relevant standards
- Summary
- Factual Background
- The PPE Cell
- The Recommendation
- The Essential Technical Requirements Document (“ETRD”)
- Precontractual Negotiations
- Closing
- Final Approval and Contract
- Manufacturing, delivery and inspection
- Rejection of the Gowns
- Testing of Gowns
- The Trial and issues
- The Contractual Claim
- The parties’ cases on construction
- The significance of the accepted obligation to deliver gowns with an SAL of 10 -6
- Was there breach of a requirement for a formally validated process in this case?
- Did the Contract require EN 556 or an Equivalent Technical Solution?
- Did the Contract require CE marking?
- The original case: Statistics, Physical Testing and Sterility
- Estoppel and related concepts
- Representation/assumption: clear?
- Approval of an ETS in place of EN 556
- Meeting the technical requirements/ No requirement to have a CE mark with an NB number
- Reliance
- Estoppel and validated process/SAL
- Non-Reliance and Entire Understanding Clauses
- Remedies
- Was the right to reject lost?
- Damages: The value of the Gowns and Mitigation
- Damages: The Claim for Storage Costs and Gown Disposal
- The Counterclaim
- Common mistake and rectification
- Negligent misstatement
- Conclusion
- Annex 1: Statistics, Physical testing and Sterility
- The testing
- Statistics
- The evidence and its implications
- The evidence gap
- Conclusion
- Annex 2: Relevant provisions of the Contract The Contract between DHSC and Medpro consists of a front page and several documents
- Order Form Section 5 of the Order Form “ The Supplier shall supply the deliverable described below on the terms set out in this Order Form and the Schedules and Annex A. Unless the Contract otherwise requires, c
- Section 7 of the Order Form is headed “Specification” and states: “The specification of the Deliverables is as set out in Annex A.1 – A.9 [26.06.2020]. Not as embedded/attached documents. Please confi
- Schedule 1
- Clause 2.2 of Schedule 1 states that the Order Form is to “ include, without limitation, the Authority’s requirements in the form of its specification and other statements and requirements, the Suppli
- Clause 3 of Schedule 1 is headed “ Quality assurance standards ” and states: “The following quality assurance standards shall apply, as appropriate, to the manufacture, supply, and/or installation of
- Conclusions
![CL-2022-000676 - [2025] EWHC 2486 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)