B: Alleged failure to comply with the Disclosure and the Contempt Application
B: Alleged failure to comply with the Disclosure and the Contempt Application
The Claimant alleges that the Defendants failed to comply with the Disclosure Order by the deadline of 26 February 2024. Consequently, the Claimant initiated contempt proceedings against the Defendants on 27 February 2024 (“the Contempt Application”).
As the Contempt Application has yet to be determined, I shall only give a summary of the position adopted by the Defendants. Each Defendant provided a witness statement in which s/he explained difficulties in locating and/or extracting the documents that fell within the terms of the Disclosure Order.
It is important to note, at this stage, that the Defendants have instructed two firms of solicitors in this matter. In relation to the original Part 8 Claim, the Defendants instructed IPS Law LLP. In relation to the Contempt Application, they instructed Taylor Rose LLP.
- Heading
- Section 1
- A: The original disclosure order
- B: Alleged failure to comply with the Disclosure and the Contempt Application
- C: Further efforts by the Claimant to enforce the Disclosure Order
- D: The without prejudice communications
- E: The Contempt Application is listed for a hearing
- F: The Defendants’ Application to strike out the Contempt Application as an abuse of process relying on without prejudice communications
- G: Without prejudice privilege: legal principles
- Conclusions
![CC-2023-000006 - [2025] EWHC 1439 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)