9 th -10 th and 12 th -13 th Defendants
9th-10th and 12th-13th Defendants
The 9th and 10th defendants are English companies of which Mr Bishop was both the sole or principal shareholder and director. Both had been dissolved but were restored to the Register on 18 June 2020 for the purpose of these proceedings. They appear to be insolvent and have played no part in these proceedings. The 12th and 13th defendants are Swedish registered companies that were formerly controlled by the 3rd defendant (Mr Gergeo). They too are in insolvent liquidation. Notwithstanding that, as a matter of Swedish law the claimant is apparently entitled to judgment against them.
- Heading
- HH Judge Pelling KC
- Background
- Parties Against Whom Judgment is Sought
- Mr Barbaros Ökten – 6 th Defendant
- 9 th -10 th and 12 th -13 th Defendants
- Issues For Determination
- Optimus Phase – The Interest Issue
- The Lex Causae Applicable to the Falcon Phase Claim
- The Reflective Loss Issue
- The Liability and Quantum Issues
- Solid Venture P2P ETI
- Boardwalk Real Estate ETI
- The WSV Pro Mittelstand ETI
- The Reditum Bond
- The Nordic Power ETI
- The Median Trust and Viceroy Industrials Bonds
- The Other Investments
- EFG International Finance Guernsey Ltd (ISIN: CH0273395175)
- EFG International Finance Guernsey Ltd (ISIN: CH0266746608))
- Notenstein Finance (Guernsey) Limited (ISIN: CH0274762357)
- Liability and Quantum
- Proprietary Remedy Declaration
- Conclusions
![CL-2020-000117 - [2025] EWHC 1620 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)