![CL-2022-000304 - [2025] EWHC 1553 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion
In my judgment the Tribunal has jurisdiction. I express no view on the merits of the dispute. I will consider with the benefit of any further argument from the parties, the Orders that should follow this conclusion.
- Heading
- Robin Knowles J, CBE
- The BIT
- The MOU
- ANRAK Aluminium Ltd, Penna Cement Ltd and The Share Holders Agreement
- The BSA
- 2009-2016
- Section 7
- The conclusion of the Tribunal
- Interpreting the BIT: generally
- “Investment” and jurisdiction
- “Investment” by RAKIA
- A “binding action” taken by the Government of Andhra Pradesh “while exercising their executive powers”
- “Under any law, rule or regulation”
- “And applied directly to” an Investment
- Conclusions