Robin Knowles J, CBE
Robin Knowles J, CBE:
Introduction
This case concerns the question whether an UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction to determine a dispute between the investment authority of the state of Ras Al Khaimah (a state of the United Arab Emirates) and the Republic of India (“India”) in connection with bauxite mining and aluminium production in India.
The arbitral tribunal comprised Lord Hoffmann (chair), Justice Chandramauli and J William Rowley QC (“the Tribunal”). As is well established, a tribunal is itself competent to rule on the issue of its jurisdiction under section 30 of the Arbitration Act 1996, but subject to challenge to the Court. The Tribunal’s conclusion was that it had no jurisdiction. The issue is now before the Court by way of challenge under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
- Heading
- Robin Knowles J, CBE
- The BIT
- The MOU
- ANRAK Aluminium Ltd, Penna Cement Ltd and The Share Holders Agreement
- The BSA
- 2009-2016
- Section 7
- The conclusion of the Tribunal
- Interpreting the BIT: generally
- “Investment” and jurisdiction
- “Investment” by RAKIA
- A “binding action” taken by the Government of Andhra Pradesh “while exercising their executive powers”
- “Under any law, rule or regulation”
- “And applied directly to” an Investment
- Conclusions
![CL-2022-000304 - [2025] EWHC 1553 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)