The conspiracy and dishonest assistance claims
The conspiracy and dishonest assistance claims
These claims arise out the seizure of Ettizan’s business in January 2013 and the subsequent dissipation of its assets, including QNB’s failure to act on a faxed request sent on Mr Al Haroun’s instructions directing QNB to freeze Ettizan’s bank accounts.
- Heading
- Section 1
- The background
- The proceedings
- The test for granting permission to amend and summary judgment
- The conspiracy and dishonest assistance claims
- Limitation
- Entitlement to sue
- The other issues raised
- The claim for procuring breach of contract
- Limitation
- Entitlement to sue
- Is it arguable that there has been a breach of contract?
- The remaining issues raised
- The jurisdiction application
- Conclusions
![Claim No: CL-2024-000435 - [2025] EWHC 1588 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)