II: The Claimants [11]-[17]
II: The Claimants [11]-[17]
The EuroChem group was founded by Mr Melnichenko in Russia in 2001. Since its foundation, the group has grown considerably and is now one of the largest fertiliser manufacturers in the world. Most of its manufacturing and production continues to take place in Russia. However, it has interests in many countries around the world. Some are in the EU; in particular, there are fertiliser production plants in Belgium and in Lithuania.
EuroChem NW2 is a single-purpose company, incorporated in Russia. Its purpose is the construction and commissioning of the new fertiliser plant at Kingisepp.
EuroChem NW2’s immediate owner is MCC EuroChem JSC (“MCC EuroChem”), a Russian company, which holds all the shares in EuroChem NW2. In turn, all the shares in MCC EuroChem are owned by EuroChem AG, which is incorporated in Switzerland. EuroChem AG therefore is the indirect owner of EuroChem NW2.
Appendix 1 to this judgment is a structure chart showing what I understand to be the current ownership structure, so far as concerns EuroChem NW2 and EuroChem AG. I discuss this in more detail below, but the structure above EuroChem AG is as follows:
100% of the shares in EuroChem AG are owned by AIM Capital Limited (“AIM Capital”), a Cypriot company. The name of this company matches the initial letters of Mr Melnichenko’s full name.
99.38% of the shares in AIM Capital are owned by Linea (CY) Limited, a Cypriot company. The remaining shares (2,000 preference shares) are held by Mrs Melnichenko, and have been frozen since she was sanctioned by the EU on 3 June 2022.
75.1% of Linea (CY) Limited is owned by the Firstline Trust. The remainder of the shares in Linea (CY) Limited are owned by Mrs Melnichenko, and have also been frozen from 3 June 2022.
The Firstline Trust is a discretionary trust, which currently has one discretionary beneficiary – Mrs Melnichenko. Until March 2022 (the precise date is controversial), the sole discretionary beneficiary was Mr Melnichenko.
The trustee of the Firstline Trust is Linetrust PTC Limited (“Linetrust PTC”), a Cypriot company. The protector of the Firstline Trust is Mr Andrei Fokin.
Linetrust PTC is owned by Lineboro (“Lineboro Trust”), a purpose trust.
The trustee of the Lineboro Trust is Alfo Trustees Limited, a Cypriot company.
It is important that the structure above EuroChem AG involves a number of trusts – above all, the Firstline Trust; and that immediately below EuroChem AG is MCC EuroChem.
It is also important that, although not shown on Appendix 1, EuroChem AG’s subsidiaries are not limited to MCC EuroChem and EuroChem NW2. EuroChem AG is the direct or indirect owner of all the other EuroChem group companies. It has several important subsidiaries in the EU, notably those relating to the plants in Belgium and in Lithuania, as well as a subsidiary incorporated in France (“EuroChem Agro France”) and a subsidiary incorporated in Italy (“EuroChem Agro Italy”).
Through MCC EuroChem, it owns various business group interests in Russia, where the bulk of the group’s existing manufacturing capacity resides. It also owns the group trading companies, which are incorporated and headquartered in the UAE. There are further subsidiaries in other countries and regions.
- Heading
- PART A: INTRODUCTION AND PARTIES [1]-[22]
- II: The Claimants [11]-[17]
- III: The Banks and Tecnimont [18]-[20]
- IV: The new Kingisepp plant [21]-[22]
- PART B: THE BONDS AND EUROCHEM NW2’S DEMANDS [23]-[45]
- VI: Designation under Regulation 269 [29]-[33]
- VII: Termination of the Contracts [34]-[37]
- VIII: EuroChem NW2’s demands on the Bonds [38]-[40]
- IX: Rejection of the demands [41]-[45]
- PART C: THE ISSUES AND THE WITNESSES [46]-[98]
- XI: The Claimants’ EuroChem AG witnesses [59]-[66]
- Mr Valters and Mr Solzhenitsyn
- Mr Hechler
- Mr Collishe
- Ms Basyrova
- XII: The Claimants’ EuroChem NW2 witness [67]-[73]
- XIII: The Claimants’ Trust witnesses [74]-[94]
- Mr Fokin
- Mr Noble
- XIV: The Banks’ witnesses [95]-[98]
- PART D: THE FACTS RE OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL [99]-[211]
- The Trusts above EuroChem AG
- The structure from EuroChem AG downwards
- XVI: The ownership structure after sanctions [110]-[123]
- Changes at the level of EuroChem AG
- Changes in directorships
- XVII: Other group structural changes [124]-[144]
- The “Future of EuroChem” memorandum
- The transfers to MCC EuroChem
- The UAE trading cluster
- Changes within EuroChem AG and the EU subsidiaries
- XVIII: Mr Melnichenko’s involvement before March 2022 [145]-[151]
- XIX: The Claimants’ first pleading point [152]-[154]
- XX: The date of the Deed of Retirement [155]-[165]
- XXI: The role of Mrs Melnichenko [166]-[175]
- XXII: Mr Melnichenko’s involvement after March 2022 (1) [176]-[187]
- XXIII: The Claimants’ second pleading point [188]-[197]
- XXIV: Mr Melnichenko’s involvement after March 2022 (2) [198]-[204]
- XXV: The Assignment [205]-[211]
- PART E: REGULATION 269 [212]-[305]
- XXVII: The supplementary EU materials [220]-[225]
- XXVIII: Decisions of the CJEU [226]-[229]
- XXIX: How to interpret Regulation 269 [230]-[240]
- XXX: Article 2(1) [241]-[248]
- XXXI: Article 2(2) [249]-[259]
- XXXII: “Ownership” [260]-[278]
- XXXIII: The Claimants’ third pleading point [279]-[282]
- XXXIV: The MP Bank v Pugachev point [283]-[293]
- XXXV: “Control” [294]-[305]
- PART F: THE NCAS [306]-[347]
- XXXVII: Firewalls and the NCAs [312]-[313]
- XXXVIII: The French NCA: the DGT [314]-[326]
- XXXIX: The Italian NCA: the CSF [327]-[332]
- XL: The Swiss NCA: the SECO [333]-[337]
- XLI: The Cypriot NCA: the SEOK [338]-[341]
- XLII: The Dutch NCA: the BTI [342]-[347]
- PART G: APPLYING REGULATION 269 [348]-[411]
- XLIV: Inferences [360]-[369]
- XLV: Article 2(1) and the Bonds [370]-[378]
- XLVI: The LIA v Maud point [379]-[399]
- XLVII: Article 2(1) and the Assignment [400]
- XLVIII: Article 2(2) and payment to EuroChem NW2 [401]-[403]
- XLIX: Article 2(2) and payment to EuroChem AG [404]-[408]
- L: The pending applications to the DGT and the CSF [409]-[411]
- PART H: REGULATION 833 [412]-[473]
- LII: Are the claims “in connection with” the Contracts? [416]-[429]
- LIII: Are the claims by or on behalf of a Russian entity? [430]-[433]
- LIV: Conclusion on Regulation 833 [434]-[435]
- PART I: THE RULE IN RALLI BROTHERS [436]-[473]
- LVI: The rule in Ralli Brothers [438]-[440]
- LVII: The place of performance under the Bonds [441]-[461]
- LVIII: Licence applications and Article 7 [462]-[465]
- LIX: Public policy [466]-[470]
- LX: Implied term [471]-[472]
- LXI: Conclusion on the rule in Ralli Brothers [473]
- PART J: OTHER ARGUMENTS [474]-[494]
- LXIII: The Bonds’ expiry dates [476]-[478]
- LXIV: Validity of the Assignment [479]-[482]
- LXV: The Assignment and Article 9 [483]-[486]
- LXVI: The sanctioned Russian banks [487]-[491]
- LXVII: ING’s Part 20 claim against Tecnimont [492]-[494]
- Conclusions
![CL-2022-000456 - [2025] EWHC 1938 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)