XII: The Claimants’ EuroChem NW2 witness [67]-[73]
XII: The Claimants’ EuroChem NW2 witness [67]-[73]
The Claimants’ only witness from EuroChem NW2, or at any level below EuroChem AG, was Mr Ilya Beloborodov. When he made his witness statement, and when he gave his oral evidence (on days 3 and 5 of the trial), he was the General Director of EuroChem NW2, which I understood to be equivalent to CEO. He seems to have been removed from this position within a few days of completing his evidence, before the service of written closing submissions. I was very sorry to learn this, as Mr Beloborodov was a particularly engaging witness, being transparently honest and extremely candid in his oral evidence.
Mr Beloborodov’s focus in his job was entirely on the completion and commissioning of the new Kingisepp plant. He had no real interest in company politics or strategy, beyond this task.
His witness statement revealed nothing about the reporting structure above EuroChem NW2, but his oral evidence revealed that MCC EuroChem had full control over EuroChem NW2. He reported initially to Mr Oleg Shiryaev, the former General Director of MCC EuroChem; more recently, to the current General Director of MCC EuroChem, Mr Andrey Vanyushin. He had no contact with EuroChem AG and seemed not to know any of the individuals at EuroChem AG.
He said that Mr Melnichenko was generally referred to and understood as “the beneficiary” and was “right at the top” of the EuroChem structure. He also said that, from his perspective, nothing much changed after sanctions were imposed.
He confirmed that, following the withdrawal of Tecnimont, the contractor constructing the new plant is Velesstroy. The decision to engage Velesstroy was taken by MCC EuroChem (specifically, Mr Shiryaev).
MCC EuroChem was also responsible for all financing decisions, including the decision to raise finance with sanctioned Russian banks. Mr Beloborodov said that this decision also involved “the lawyers that support EuroChem NW2” – which I took to mean (or at least include) Mr Konstantin Kryazhevskikh, who was the only lawyer Mr Beloborodov identified by name, and who is a lawyer associated with EuroChem AG’s immediate owner, AIM Capital.
Mr Beloborodov was the individual who signed the Claimants’ disclosure certificates. However, he had no knowledge of or familiarity with any of the detailed information that they contained. In this regard, he seems to have acted as suggested by Mr Kryazhevskikh.
- Heading
- PART A: INTRODUCTION AND PARTIES [1]-[22]
- II: The Claimants [11]-[17]
- III: The Banks and Tecnimont [18]-[20]
- IV: The new Kingisepp plant [21]-[22]
- PART B: THE BONDS AND EUROCHEM NW2’S DEMANDS [23]-[45]
- VI: Designation under Regulation 269 [29]-[33]
- VII: Termination of the Contracts [34]-[37]
- VIII: EuroChem NW2’s demands on the Bonds [38]-[40]
- IX: Rejection of the demands [41]-[45]
- PART C: THE ISSUES AND THE WITNESSES [46]-[98]
- XI: The Claimants’ EuroChem AG witnesses [59]-[66]
- Mr Valters and Mr Solzhenitsyn
- Mr Hechler
- Mr Collishe
- Ms Basyrova
- XII: The Claimants’ EuroChem NW2 witness [67]-[73]
- XIII: The Claimants’ Trust witnesses [74]-[94]
- Mr Fokin
- Mr Noble
- XIV: The Banks’ witnesses [95]-[98]
- PART D: THE FACTS RE OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL [99]-[211]
- The Trusts above EuroChem AG
- The structure from EuroChem AG downwards
- XVI: The ownership structure after sanctions [110]-[123]
- Changes at the level of EuroChem AG
- Changes in directorships
- XVII: Other group structural changes [124]-[144]
- The “Future of EuroChem” memorandum
- The transfers to MCC EuroChem
- The UAE trading cluster
- Changes within EuroChem AG and the EU subsidiaries
- XVIII: Mr Melnichenko’s involvement before March 2022 [145]-[151]
- XIX: The Claimants’ first pleading point [152]-[154]
- XX: The date of the Deed of Retirement [155]-[165]
- XXI: The role of Mrs Melnichenko [166]-[175]
- XXII: Mr Melnichenko’s involvement after March 2022 (1) [176]-[187]
- XXIII: The Claimants’ second pleading point [188]-[197]
- XXIV: Mr Melnichenko’s involvement after March 2022 (2) [198]-[204]
- XXV: The Assignment [205]-[211]
- PART E: REGULATION 269 [212]-[305]
- XXVII: The supplementary EU materials [220]-[225]
- XXVIII: Decisions of the CJEU [226]-[229]
- XXIX: How to interpret Regulation 269 [230]-[240]
- XXX: Article 2(1) [241]-[248]
- XXXI: Article 2(2) [249]-[259]
- XXXII: “Ownership” [260]-[278]
- XXXIII: The Claimants’ third pleading point [279]-[282]
- XXXIV: The MP Bank v Pugachev point [283]-[293]
- XXXV: “Control” [294]-[305]
- PART F: THE NCAS [306]-[347]
- XXXVII: Firewalls and the NCAs [312]-[313]
- XXXVIII: The French NCA: the DGT [314]-[326]
- XXXIX: The Italian NCA: the CSF [327]-[332]
- XL: The Swiss NCA: the SECO [333]-[337]
- XLI: The Cypriot NCA: the SEOK [338]-[341]
- XLII: The Dutch NCA: the BTI [342]-[347]
- PART G: APPLYING REGULATION 269 [348]-[411]
- XLIV: Inferences [360]-[369]
- XLV: Article 2(1) and the Bonds [370]-[378]
- XLVI: The LIA v Maud point [379]-[399]
- XLVII: Article 2(1) and the Assignment [400]
- XLVIII: Article 2(2) and payment to EuroChem NW2 [401]-[403]
- XLIX: Article 2(2) and payment to EuroChem AG [404]-[408]
- L: The pending applications to the DGT and the CSF [409]-[411]
- PART H: REGULATION 833 [412]-[473]
- LII: Are the claims “in connection with” the Contracts? [416]-[429]
- LIII: Are the claims by or on behalf of a Russian entity? [430]-[433]
- LIV: Conclusion on Regulation 833 [434]-[435]
- PART I: THE RULE IN RALLI BROTHERS [436]-[473]
- LVI: The rule in Ralli Brothers [438]-[440]
- LVII: The place of performance under the Bonds [441]-[461]
- LVIII: Licence applications and Article 7 [462]-[465]
- LIX: Public policy [466]-[470]
- LX: Implied term [471]-[472]
- LXI: Conclusion on the rule in Ralli Brothers [473]
- PART J: OTHER ARGUMENTS [474]-[494]
- LXIII: The Bonds’ expiry dates [476]-[478]
- LXIV: Validity of the Assignment [479]-[482]
- LXV: The Assignment and Article 9 [483]-[486]
- LXVI: The sanctioned Russian banks [487]-[491]
- LXVII: ING’s Part 20 claim against Tecnimont [492]-[494]
- Conclusions
![CL-2022-000456 - [2025] EWHC 1938 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)