The principles applicable on the hearing of an interim ASI
The principles applicable on the hearing of an interim ASI
As I have already stated, in order to obtain an interim ASI on a contractual or derived rights (or, as it is sometimes put, quasi-contractual) basis, the claimant must show a “high degree of probability” that there is an exclusive forum agreement which applies to the subject-matter of the claim in the proceedings sought to be enjoined.
In this case, the Croda Parties seek relief which is both prohibitory and mandatory in form. In general, mandatory orders are more likely to be irreversible in their effects than prohibitory orders, and this is a relevant factor when considering whether to grant an ASI in mandatory terms.
- Heading
- In this matter, the applicants (“ the Croda Parties ”) seek interim anti-suit injunctions (“ ASI ”s)
- The background
- The applicable legal principles
- Where the proceedings to be restrained are vexatious and oppressive
- The principles applicable on the hearing of an interim ASI
- Croda Europe’s claim for ASI relief against ATL
- Do the EJCs apply to the claims by ATL against Croda Europe in the Delaware Proceedings?
- Has Croda Europe shown a high degree of probability that AgLLC is asserting claims in the Delaware Proceedings which were derived from AL or ATL and which are subject to the EJCs as between ATL/AL and
- Has ATL shown strong reasons to refuse the relief sought by Croda Europe?
- Claims on the vexatious and oppressive basis
- The form of the Complaint
- Conclusions
![CL-2025-000380 - [2025] EWHC 2462 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)