![Case Nos: CA-2024-002167 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1230](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png){kind=logo}
Error al cargar el documento
- Heading
- The Lady Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill CJ, Dame Victoria Sharp P. and Lord Justice Coulson Introduction
- The core immunity and its extension
- Immunity from negligence claims by clients
- The Factual Background
- XGY’s Claims and the Applications To Strike Out/Reverse Summary Judgment
- The Judgment of HHJ Brownhill: A Summary
- The Judgment of Ritchie J: A Summary
- The Issues on Appeal
- The Relevant Context: A Bail Hearing
- The CPS Appeal: Is the CPS advocate Protected By The Core Immunity?
- The Police Appeal: Are They Protected By An Immunity?
- Both Appeals: Does The Immunity Apply To All of XGY’s Claims?
- The DPA and the HRA
- Both Appeals: Did XGY Meet The Section 7 Criterion?
- HHJ Brownhill’s Conclusions
- The Approach of Ritchie J
- Conclusions