Juristeca
Juristeca País
    Case No. IP-2019-000175
    Intellectual Property Enterprise Court

    Case No. IP-2019-000175

    Fecha: 03-Sep-2020

    Error al cargar el documento

    Vista, DOCUMENTO COMPLETO
    • INTRODUCTION
    • Restrictive Covenants
    • Claimant Works
    • Copyright Infringement
    • Breach of contract
    • Restrictive covenants
    • PROCEEDINGS
    • Terms of Employment
    • Storage of works created at DPA
    • Software used at DPA at the relevant time
    • Rhino
    • CGI work at DPA
    • DPA’s position
    • None of these searches found the Rhino 3D CGI models.
    • Wellington House
    • Wellington House Works
    • www.mudaarchitecture.com
    • Use made by Mr D’Aguanno of 3D models removed from DPA
    • ADA Stored Works
    • DETERMINATION OF THE REMAINING ISSUES ON LIABILITY
    • Issue 1 – Have the Defendants reproduced a substantial part of the Claimant Works or any of them, in a material form?
    • Issue 2 – Have the Defendants or any of them possessed the Claimant Works or any of them in the course of a business.
    • Issue 3 – Have the Defendants reproduced a substantial part of the Claimant Works or otherwise used the Claimant Works in their ongoing work for Mr Simpson?
    • Issue 4 – Have the Defendants or any of them authorised the acts set out at paragraphs 1 to 3 above?
    • Issue 5 – Did Mr D’Aguanno or Ms Muller fail to store the Claimant Works or any of them on DPA’s server?
    • Issue 6 – Did Mr D’Aguanno or Ms Muller remove the Claimant Works or any of them from DPA’s offices and/or prevent DPA from having access to its files?
    • Issue 7 - Does DPA have access to the Claimant Works which are in the possession of the Defendants?
    • Issue 8 - Did Mr D’Aguanno or Ms Muller fail to return all of the Claimant’s property when their contracts with DPA ended?
    • QUANTUM
    • CONCLUSION

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca