Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2023] UKUT 193 (AAC)
    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

    [2023] UKUT 193 (AAC)

    Fecha: 21-Jul-2021

    Error al cargar el documento

    Vista, DOCUMENTO COMPLETO
    • Heading
    • Section 1
    • I set that decision aside and re-make it as follows
    • REASONS
    • The facts
    • The total claimed overpayment was therefore £7,488.40
    • Gravesham’s decisions
    • The manuscript worksheet dated 23 January 2018 in the supporting papers states that the student finance figures were
    • disregarding the Parents’ Learning Allowance (see paragraph 23 above) under regulation 59(4) of the Regulations
    • Digression: Gravesham’s letter of 29 November 2017
    • The relevant law
    • Housing benefit legislation
    • who have been assessed, or treated, as incapable of work for 196 days who have been assessed as, or treated as, having, limited capability for work for 196 days
    • who are deaf and in respect of certain specified payments have been awarded from public funds
    • The European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act
    • The Equality Act
    • CH/4429/2006
    • The Tribunal’s decision
    • Permission to appeal and the Secretary of State
    • Grounds of Appeal
    • The responses
    • Hearing
    • Discussion
    • The interpretation of regulation 64: CH/4429/2006
    • deciding whether to accept those terms; and if so completing the form and returning it to the Student Finance Authority
    • The interpretation of regulation 64: Gravesham’s submissions
    • The interpretation of regulation 64: the Secretary of State’s submissions
    • Administrative inconvenience and the floodgates
    • Discrimination
    • The Upper Tribunal’s decision
    • Conclusions

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca