On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service (the “DBS”)
On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service (the “DBS”)
DBS Reference: 00946687833
Final Decision Letter: 20 October 2021
This decision is given under section 4 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (the “SVGA”).
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to ALLOW the appeal and REMIT the matter to the DBS for a new decision.
The decision of the DBS communicated by letter dated 20 October 2021 to place the Appellant’s name on the Adults’ Barred List and the Children’s Barred List was based on a material mistake of fact.
Pursuant to sections 4(6)(b) and (7)(a) and (b) of the SVGA, the Upper Tribunal remits the matter to the DBS for a new decision and directs that the appellant’s name is removed from both lists until the DBS makes its new decision.
REASONS
Introduction
The Appellant (also referred to as “AA”) appeals to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of the Respondent (the Disclosure and Barring Service or “DBS”) to include her name in the Children’s Barred List (“CBL”) and the Adults’ Barred List (“ABL”) in accordance with paragraphs 3 and 9 (respectively) of Schedule 3 to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (“the Act”). This decision was communicated to the Appellant in a Final Decision Letter (“FDL”) dated 20 October 2021.
Permission to appeal was granted on 9 June 2022 on limited grounds. An oral hearing of the appeal took place before the Upper Tribunal in The Rolls Building, Royal Courts of Justice, London on 3 September 2024. The Appellant was present and was represented by Mr B. Odebo, a lay representative. The Respondent was represented by Ms K. Elliot of Counsel. We, the panel of the Upper Tribunal constituted to hear this appeal (also referred to as “the tribunal” or “the panel”), are very grateful to both representatives for their written and oral submissions in this matter.
Throughout this decision, numbers in square brackets (“[ ]”) refer to pages within the Upper Tribunal bundle of documents in this appeal.
- Heading
- On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service (the “DBS”)
- Background to DBS involvement
- The barring decision
- Grounds of Appeal
- Approach of the Upper Tribunal
- The legislation
- The appeal provisions
- The Upper Tribunal’s “mistake of fact” jurisdiction
- The evidence before the Upper Tribunal
- Allegation 1: The Appellant stole £100 after entering an incorrect amount in the cashbook in relation to AO’s bank withdrawal on 11 April 2020 (finding amended following representations)
- The oral evidence
- Analysis of the evidence
- Allegation 2: Taking cashbooks relating to financial transactions for service users from [the workplace] supported living environment and damaged/tried to dispose of these records on 31/10/2020
- Oral evidence
- Analysis
- Allegation 3: Breach of the terms of a safeguarding suspension by ringing FOA, a staff member, at [the workplace] on Friday 30/10/20 and then attending the place of work on 31/10/20
- Oral evidence
- Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 041 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)