The appeal provisions
The appeal provisions
Section 4(2) of the SVGA confers a right of appeal to the Upper Tribunal against a decision by the DBS on the grounds that the DBS has made a mistake on any point of law; or a mistake in any finding of fact which it has made and on which the decision was based. For an appeal to succeed therefore, the Appellant must demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the DBS either made an error of law or a material error of fact in its decision (PF v DBS [2020] UKUT 256 (AAC).
Section 4(3) of the SVGA states that “the decision whether or not it is appropriate for an individual to be included in a barred list is not a question of law or fact.” The question of appropriateness is therefore not a matter within the Upper Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
- Heading
- On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service (the “DBS”)
- Background to DBS involvement
- The barring decision
- Grounds of Appeal
- Approach of the Upper Tribunal
- The legislation
- The appeal provisions
- The Upper Tribunal’s “mistake of fact” jurisdiction
- The evidence before the Upper Tribunal
- Allegation 1: The Appellant stole £100 after entering an incorrect amount in the cashbook in relation to AO’s bank withdrawal on 11 April 2020 (finding amended following representations)
- The oral evidence
- Analysis of the evidence
- Allegation 2: Taking cashbooks relating to financial transactions for service users from [the workplace] supported living environment and damaged/tried to dispose of these records on 31/10/2020
- Oral evidence
- Analysis
- Allegation 3: Breach of the terms of a safeguarding suspension by ringing FOA, a staff member, at [the workplace] on Friday 30/10/20 and then attending the place of work on 31/10/20
- Oral evidence
- Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 041 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)