The appeal is DISMISSED
The appeal is DISMISSED
Subject Matter: Resignation of transport manager; failure to respond to correspondence or seek a period of grace; revocation of licence
Cases referred to: None
REASONS FOR DECISION
This is an appeal from the decision of the Traffic Commissioner for London and the South East of England (“TC”) dated 20th March 2023, when she revoked the Appellant’s standard national operator’s licence with immediate effect under s.27(1)(a) of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995 (“the Act).
The background to this appeal is as follows. On 11th March 2022, the Appellant (“Mixingh”) was granted a standard national licence authorising two vehicles and two trailers. The sole director was Gurjeet Sandhu. No vehicles have been specified on the licence since its grant.
On 11th February 2023, the nominated transport manager, Harshdeep Mandair, emailed the Office of the Traffic Commissioner (“OTC”) to inform the TC that he had resigned as Mixingh’s transport manager with immediate effect.
On the 14th February 2023, the OTC wrote to Mixingh, sending copies of the letter by recorded delivery to its operating centre and to its correspondence address with a further copy sent by email. The letter reminded the company that It was a statutory requirement to have a suitable transport manager designated on its licence or alternatively, to have the benefit of a period of grace and that failure to have either would result in the revocation of the company’s licence under s.27(1) of the Act. The letter invited representations or an application for a public inquiry by 7th March 2023.
One of the recorded delivery letters was returned to the OTC (it is unclear which one) marked “unable to deliver .. as it was not possible to identify the delivery address”. There was no response in answer to the other recorded delivery letter or to that sent by email. By a letter dated 20th March 2023, the company was informed that its licence had been revoked.
On 12th April 2023, Mr Sandhu submitted an application for permission to appeal. He asked that the TC “rethink” her decision. He made the following points:
the company had not operated any vehicles under the licence;
following the resignation of Mr Mandair, Mr Sandhu had been looking for a suitable transport manager;
since the granting of the licence “the business are struggling with the price hike and instability of the market” (sic);
he was about to buy a vehicle, hence his search for a new transport manager;
revocation of the licence will “hamper my startup of my future”.
![[2023] UKUT 250 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)