[2023] UKUT 238 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2023] UKUT 238 (AAC)

Fecha: 23-Oct-2023

In short, the Father’s income from property management cannot be neither earned nor unearned

In short, the Father’s income from property management cannot be neither earned nor unearned.

60.

There is no evidence to suggest that this mischaracterisation was anything other than an innocent error. It nevertheless affected the figures reported by HMRC to the Secretary of State and would have done so even if—which the FTT decided was not the case—those figures were correct. HMRC did not treat the property management income as earned income: had it done so, the reported figure for earned income would have been higher than £12,208. If they had treated it as unearned income, the unearned income should not have been nil. And if the income really had been “other UK income”, it would have been chargeable to tax under section 687 of ITTOIA, which is in Part 5 of that Act. It would therefore have fallen within the definition of unearned income in regulation 69(2) and HMRC should informed the Secretary of State accordingly.

61.

The point is that, for anyone with income that is not taxed under PAYE, the completion of a tax return can seem complex and difficult. The information provided to the Secretary of State by HMRC may be incorrect not merely because the non-resident parent has—for whatever reason—misstated the total amount of his income, or because HMRC has either misread the return or entered the figures on its computer system incorrectly. The non-resident parent’s allocation of his income between the various categories under which income tax is chargeable may also be incorrect.