A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
I allow the Secretary of State’s further appeal to the Upper Tribunal. This is because the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involves a legal error. For that reason, I set aside the Tribunal’s decision. I re-make the decision that the Tribunal should have made. This is that the claimant’s appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision dated 28 January 2022 is refused. This is because the claimant is not entitled to ALSO with effect from the date of claim (23 December 2020) or from any later date (e.g. 1 November 2021) before the date of decision.
In this decision I refer to the Appellant as the Secretary of State to avoid any confusion. I refer to the Respondent as the claimant for the same reason. To protect the claimant’s privacy, and to avoid the risk of ‘jigsaw identification’, I refer to the claimant’s former employer in those terms rather than by their name.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the Secretary of State’s appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 26 October 2022 under case number SD/00065/2022 was made in error of law
- The subject matter of this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- An outline of the course of the appeal
- A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- The legal background to ALSO
- The factual background to this appeal
- The Secretary of State’s decision on the new claim for ALSO
- The claimant’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
- The Secretary of State’s grounds of appeal
- Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 246 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)