Conclusions
Conclusion
I therefore conclude that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involves an error of law. I allow the appeal and set aside the decision of the Tribunal (Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act (TCEA) 2007, section 12(2)(a)). I re-make the decision under appeal (TCEA 2007, section 12(2)(b)(ii)). I substitute the following decision for the decision of the Tribunal, namely that the claimant’s appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision of 28 January 2022 is refused. This is because the claimant is not entitled to ALSO with effect from the date of claim on 23 December 2020 (or from 1 November 2021). This, in turn, is because the claimant was not incapable of following an occupation with equivalent gross income to that of his regular service occupation. My decision is also as set out above.
Nicholas Wikeley
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Authorised for issue on 5 October 2023
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the Secretary of State’s appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 26 October 2022 under case number SD/00065/2022 was made in error of law
- The subject matter of this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- An outline of the course of the appeal
- A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- The legal background to ALSO
- The factual background to this appeal
- The Secretary of State’s decision on the new claim for ALSO
- The claimant’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
- The Secretary of State’s grounds of appeal
- Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 246 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)