The proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
The proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
The Secretary of State subsequently filed an expanded and fully reasoned notice of appeal (settled by counsel) directly with the Upper Tribunal. Judge Hemingway granted the Secretary of State permission to appeal. Ms Jennifer Seaman of Counsel (on behalf of the Secretary of State) and Mr Glyn Tucker of the Royal British Legion (on behalf of the claimant) have each provided helpful written submissions on the appeal. Both parties have indicated a wish to have an oral hearing, but then immediately qualified that rather lukewarm preference by stating that this was only if the Upper Tribunal wished to hear further legal arguments. However, I am satisfied that the issues have been well ventilated in the parties’ written submissions. I am not persuaded that an oral hearing of the appeal is necessary or proportionate. I am therefore proceeding to determine the appeal on the papers.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the Secretary of State’s appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 26 October 2022 under case number SD/00065/2022 was made in error of law
- The subject matter of this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- An outline of the course of the appeal
- A summary of the Upper Tribunal’s decision
- The legal background to ALSO
- The factual background to this appeal
- The Secretary of State’s decision on the new claim for ALSO
- The claimant’s appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
- The Secretary of State’s grounds of appeal
- Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 246 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)