Appeals of decisions to include, or not to remove, persons in the Barred Lists
Appeals of decisions to include, or not to remove, persons in the Barred Lists
Section 4 of the 2006 Act provides for a right of appeal to the Upper Tribunal in limited circumstances:
“4. Appeals
(1) An individual who is included in a barred list may appeal to the Upper Tribunal against-
…..
(b) a decision under paragraph 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 or 11 of Schedule 3 to include him in the list;
(c) a decision under paragraph 17, 18 or 18A of that Schedule not to remove him from the list.
(2) An appeal under subsection (1) may be made only on the grounds that DBS has made a mistake-
(a) on any point of law;
(b) in any finding of fact which it has made and on which the decision mentioned in that subsection was based.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), the decision whether or not it is appropriate for an individual to be included in a barred list is not a question of law or fact.
(4) An appeal under subsection (1) may be made only with permission of the Upper Tribunal.
(5) Unless the Upper Tribunal finds that DBS has made a mistake of law or fact, it must confirm the decision of DBS.
(6) If the Upper Tribunal finds that DBS has made such a mistake it must-
(a) direct DBS to remove the person from the list, or
(b) remit the matter to DBS for a new decision.
(7) If the Upper Tribunal remits a matter to DBS under subsection 6(b)-
(a) the Upper Tribunal may set out any findings of fact which it has made (on which DBS must base its new decision); and
(b) the person must be removed from the list until DBS makes its new decision, unless the Upper Tribunal directs otherwise.”
- Heading
- On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service ( “DBS” )
- Factual background
- The statutory framework
- Duty to maintain the Barred Lists
- Criteria for inclusion in the Barred Lists
- Appeals of decisions to include, or not to remove, persons in the Barred Lists
- The authorities on the Upper Tribunal’s jurisdiction
- The agreed facts
- MM’s grounds of appeal
- The appeal hearing
- The oral evidence
- Section 12
- Discussion
- Ground 2 – was inclusion in the children’s barred list irrational or disproportionate?
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 275 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)