Conclusions
Conclusion
I conclude that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involves an error of law. I allow the appeal and set aside the decision under section 12(2)(a) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (the “TCEA”).
What happens next
Given the tortured history of these proceedings and the quite understandable frustration of both the Mother and Father I have given serious consideration to exercising my discretion to re-make the decisions under appeal.
However, because further facts need to be found, even if I were to remake the decisions there would realistically need to be an oral hearing before me, and so it is unlikely that any time would be saved. Because of that, I consider that it is appropriate, and in the interests of justice, for the appeal to be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for rehearing.
Under section 12(2)(b)(i) of the TCEA these appeals are remitted for re-hearing by a new tribunal subject to the directions above.
Thomas Church
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Authorised by the Judge for issue on 21January 2025
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeals. The decisions of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error of law. Under section 12(2) (a), (b)(i) and (3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enfo
- These appeals relate to the liability of the Appellant (whom I shall refer to as the “Father” ) to make payments to the Second Respondent (whom I shall refer to as the “Mother” ) in respect of the mai
- I give guidance to the First-tier Tribunal about
- Factual background
- Legal framework
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The permission stage and the parties’ submissions
- Analysis
- The Tribunal’s fact finding
- Reasons
- What the reasons must cover
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 027 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)