Regulation 19 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013
Regulation 19 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013
Central to the outcome of this case is regulation 19 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/376; “the UC Regulations 2013”). As amended, this provides as follows:
Restrictions on entitlement – prisoners etc.
—(1) Entitlement to universal credit does not arise where a person is—
a member of a religious order who is fully maintained by their order;
a prisoner; or
serving a sentence of imprisonment detained in hospital.
Paragraph (1)(b) does not apply during the first 6 months when the person is a prisoner where—
the person was entitled to universal credit as a single person immediately before becoming a prisoner, and the calculation of their award included an amount for the housing costs element; and
the person has not been sentenced to a term in custody that is expected to extend beyond that 6 months.
In the case of a prisoner to whom paragraph (2) applies, an award of universal credit is not to include any element other than the housing costs element.
In paragraph (1)(c) a person serving a sentence of imprisonment detained in hospital is a person who is—
being detained—
under section 45A or 47 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (power of higher courts to direct hospital admission; removal to hospital of persons serving sentence of imprisonment etc), and
before the day which the Secretary of State certifies to be that person's release date within the meaning of section 50(3) of that Act (in any case where there is such a release date); or
being detained under—
section 59A of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (hospital direction), or
section 136 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 (transfer of prisoners for treatment of mental disorder).
At this stage, two points about the construction of regulation 19 are worthy of note. First, the term “prisoner” includes a person “who is detained in custody pending trial” (i.e. on remand): see regulation 2 of the UC Regulations 2013. Secondly, regulation 19 stipulates rather curiously that “entitlement to universal credit does not arise” for prescribed categories of claimants, rather than simply stating that such a person “is not entitled to Universal Credit”. The significance of this distinction (if any) is less than clear.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the Secretary of State’s appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 3 August 2022 under number SC285/22/00888 was made in error of law. Unde
- The issue that arises on this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Some preliminaries
- The chronology of this case
- Regulation 19 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013
- The decisions by the Secretary of State’s decision-maker
- The decision of the First-tier Tribunal
- Analysis
- Disposal
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 274 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)