Some preliminaries
Some preliminaries
In this decision, and so as to avoid the potential for confusion, I refer to the Appellant as “the Secretary of State” and the Respondent as “the claimant”.
It is unfortunate that the claimant has taken no part in these proceedings, despite the efforts of the Upper Tribunal. Earlier case management directions suggested that he could contact his local law centre (whose contact details were provided). The appeal bundle was also re-sent to his new address when that became known. However, the claimant has not taken up the opportunity to make any representations in these proceedings. I recognise that he may have seen little point in engaging with the further appeals process as he has already lost the tenancy of the property concerned due to the non-payment of UC.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the Secretary of State’s appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 3 August 2022 under number SC285/22/00888 was made in error of law. Unde
- The issue that arises on this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Some preliminaries
- The chronology of this case
- Regulation 19 of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013
- The decisions by the Secretary of State’s decision-maker
- The decision of the First-tier Tribunal
- Analysis
- Disposal
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 274 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)