Statutory Framework
Statutory Framework
Section 85(2) of the Equality Act 2010 provides:
The responsible body of [a school to which this section applies] must not discriminate against a pupil—
in the way it provides education for the pupil;
in the way it affords the pupil access to a benefit, facility or service;
by not providing education for the pupil;
by not affording the pupil access to a benefit, facility or service;
by excluding the pupil from the school;
by subjecting the pupil to any other detriment.
. . .
In relation to England and Wales, this section applies to—
a school maintained by a local authority;
. . .
The responsible body of a school to which this section applies is—
if the school is within subsection (7)(a), the local authority or governing body;
Section 116(1)(a) and (3) of the Equality Act 2010 provides that Education cases are claims that may be made to the First-tier Tribunal in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 17 and that Schedule 17 (disabled pupils: enforcement) has effect.
Schedule 17, paragraph 4 makes provisions on time limits:
Proceedings on a claim may not be brought after the end of the period of 6 months starting with the date when the conduct complained of occurred.
. . .
The Tribunal may consider a claim which is out of time.
Sub-paragraph (3) does not apply if the Tribunal has previously decided under that sub-paragraph not to consider a claim.
For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1)—
conduct extending over a period is to be treated as occurring at the end of the period;
failure to do something is to be treated as occurring when the person in question decided on it.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, a person (P) is to be taken to decide on failure to do something—
when P acts inconsistently with doing it, or
if P does not act inconsistently, on the expiry of the period in which P might reasonably have been expected to do it.
Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 provides:
A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if -
A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B's disability, and
A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability.”
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 22 June 2022 under number EH301/21/00046 was made in error of law. Under section 12(2) (a) an
- REASONS FOR THE DECISION
- The case put to the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decisions and reasons
- The substantive claim
- Proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
- The issues on this appeal
- Statutory Framework
- Caselaw authorities
- Discussion
- Appeal Ground 2
- Permission to appeal on Appal Grounds 3, 4 and 5
- Appeal Ground 3
- Appeal Ground 4
- Appeal Ground 5
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 311 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)