DBS’s arguments
DBS’s arguments
DBS emphasised the following evidence about the May 2021 incident, in the “position of trust meeting” minutes:
P was “extremely upset”
P and her mother met with the head teacher at 8.45 am on 12 May 2021; the account given to the head teacher of the incident was fairly detailed
the head teacher considered P a “very honest” child
on 9.30 am that day (12 May 2021), the head teacher spoke to the children in the class; the minutes say that “other children within the class had witnessed the allegation against CW – hit [P] across the wrist with his pen, put his hand on [P’s] head and pushed down into the chair”.
The following passage from the minutes:
“[The head teacher] referred to the children that had witnessed the incident with [P] and stated that one girl said that CW ‘whacked’ her with his pen for talking and [P] started crying in the R.E lesson after lunch and [P] was moved and she and [another pupil] were told not to talk to her. The girl said that [P] continued to cry and CW bumped her as he moved her onto a chair and she said “ouch”. She stated that another child said that they thought that CW was unkind to girls, but got on with the boys. He said that he did not want to be mean to the teacher, but he felt that it was unfair on some of the girls and thought that [P] had done lots of work, but CW was horrid to her. The pupil said that CW’s tone when he spoke to [P] was really angry and then he hit her with his pen. He said that CW looked at his work and he did not want the same to happen to him that had happened to [P], e.g., being moved for pushed in the chair.
[The head teacher] said that another pupil said that CW was nice to the boys and liked acting a bit silly, but did not like the girls and he was worried too and referred to CW tapping [P] on her head. Another pupil said that CW told [P] to sit down, CW pushed her and she sat down and started crying.”
DBS emphasised that the evidence of the 2019 incident says that the child concerned gave information about the incident to the assistant head of the school; that the assistant head investigated what happened; and did so by speaking to “reliable trustworthy children”.
As regards the November 2019 incident, DBS pointed to CW’s statement in his 10 May 2022 representations that
“When teaching I always try to encourage children to go to the toilet at break and lunchtimes to avoid disruptions to learning. However, I always ask if a child is desperate and let them go if they are. If they tell me they can wait I always remind them to ask again if they become desperate. I certainly would never refuse a child access to the toilet if they say they can’t wait until the next break or lunchtime”.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the Respondent made on 25 May 2022 (reference DBS6191 00956179999) to include CW in the children’s barred list is confirmed
- This appeal
- Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
- Documentary evidence before the Upper Tribunal
- Procedural issue: application to admit witness statement from CW
- CW’s arguments on the appeal
- DBS’s arguments
- Discussion
- Our decision on the substantive appeal
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 19 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)