[2023] UKUT 245 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2023] UKUT 245 (AAC)

Fecha: 14-Mar-2023

Discussion

Discussion

Ground 1

42.

Ground 1 alleges that the Appellant was denied a fair hearing because the late disclosure on the day before the two-day hearing before the First-tier Tribunal of 99 documents, running to some 320 pages, denied him and his counsel an adequate opportunity to consider and respond to that material, resulting in material unfairness.

43.

I initially refused permission to pursue this ground of appeal on the papers, but the Appellant renewed his application in respect of this ground before Judge Jacobs who, after hearing oral argument, was persuaded to grant permission.

44.

At the oral hearing before me Mr Fowles was able to cast further light on the difficulties that the Appellant, and he himself, had faced as a result of the provision of documents that Ground 1 complains of on the eve of the hearing before the Tribunal.

45.

Mr Blake, for the Second Respondent, maintained that the supposedly late disclosure was not late at all, because the documents provided were documents that were already available to the Appellant through other sources, or were otherwise not required to be disclosed by the Second Respondent, and that they were provided purely in the spirit of helpfulness. He said that events in the lead-up to the hearing were ‘fast-moving’, and the Appellant too had provided documents late in the day.

46.

I have decided in relation to Ground 2 that it is appropriate and in the interests of justice to set the FtT Decision aside and remit the matter to be re-heard by the First-tier Tribunal. Any unfairness that may have arisen as a result of documents being provided the day prior to the hearing before the First-tier Tribunal will therefore be subsumed in the rehearing. I do not, therefore, need to reach any conclusions on Ground 1.