CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
that the Tribunal’s own remarks indicate the potential for a face-to-face hearing to have had an impact on its assessment of the evidence, I am satisfied that the Tribunal’s error was a material one. If the Tribunal had properly considered the matter, it may have adjourned.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error of law. Under section 12(2) (a), (b)(i) and (3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforc
- These Directions may be supplemented by later directions by a Tribunal Caseworker, Tribunal Registrar or Judge in the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- Background
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- Legal framework
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- The grounds of appeal and the parties’ submissions
- Ground 1: assistance/aids required to put on compression stockings (activities 3 and 6)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- Ground 2: Engaging with other people face to face (activity 9)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- Ground 3: Proceeding with the hearing as a telephone hearing
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- What happens next
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)