The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error of law. Under section 12(2) (a), (b)(i) and (3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforc
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error of law. Under section 12(2)(a), (b)(i) and (3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, I set that decision aside and remit the case to be reconsidered by a fresh tribunal in accordance with the following directions.
DIRECTIONS
This case is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration at an oral hearing.
The new First-tier Tribunal should not involve the tribunal judge, medical member or disability member previously involved in considering this appeal on 5 June 2023.
The appellant is reminded that the new First-tier Tribunal can only consider the appeal by reference to their health and other circumstances as they were at the date of the original decision by the Secretary of State under appeal (namely 6 May 2022).
If the appellant has any further written evidence to put before the First-tier Tribunal relating to that period, including any further medical evidence, this should be sent to the relevant HMCTS regional tribunal office within one month of the issue of this decision.
The new First-tier Tribunal is not bound in any way by the decision of the previous tribunal. Depending on the findings of fact it makes, the new tribunal may reach the same or a different outcome to the previous tribunal.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error of law. Under section 12(2) (a), (b)(i) and (3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforc
- These Directions may be supplemented by later directions by a Tribunal Caseworker, Tribunal Registrar or Judge in the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- Background
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- Legal framework
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- The grounds of appeal and the parties’ submissions
- Ground 1: assistance/aids required to put on compression stockings (activities 3 and 6)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- Ground 2: Engaging with other people face to face (activity 9)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP NCN: [2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)
- Ground 3: Proceeding with the hearing as a telephone hearing
- CF -v- SSWP (PIP) Appeal no. UA-2024-000104-PIP
- What happens next
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 244 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)