![[2023] UKUT 170 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
The Appellant’s submissions on his notice of appeal
The Appellant’s submissions on his notice of appeal
TheAppellant’s notice of appeal is economically drafted and for the most part set out in ‘bullet point’ format. Mr Shipton asserts that the consequences of Mr Palmer-Dunk’s absence were not explained to him. However, he neither provides any details as to the exchange that took place at the FTT hearing nor does he explain what were the ‘consequences’ of the absence of the missing panel member, nor how they were capable of making a material difference to the outcome or the fairness of the proceedings.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal dated 28 November 2022 under number EA/2021/0034 involves an error of law. However, the First-tier Tr
- The sole issue on this appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- The outcome of the appeal
- The parties to this appeal
- The FOIA request and the Information Commissioner’s Decision Notice
- A chronology of the proceedings in the First-tier Tribunal
- The Upper Tribunal’s grant of permission to appeal
- The proceedings before the Upper Tribunal
- The Appellant’s submissions on his notice of appeal
- The Information Commissioner’s submissions in response
- The Council’s submissions in response
- The Appellant’s submissions in reply
- The rules governing the composition of the First-tier Tribunal
- The natural justice point
- Disposal
- Conclusions