![[2024] UKUT 290 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
The background to this appeal is that Mr Puchooa has, since at least mid-2018, been concerned about anti-social behaviour ( “ASB” ) in the street where he lives. He entered into correspondence with va
The background to this appeal is that Mr Puchooa has, since at least mid-2018, been concerned about anti-social behaviour (“ASB”) in the street where he lives. He entered into correspondence with various people at his local authority and in the Metropolitan Police Service, as he felt that his concerns weren’t being addressed appropriately. Mr Puchooa received an email from the mayor’s office on 6 May 2020 which he felt to be inconsistent with earlier communications with an anti-social behaviour investigator. It is fair to say that Mr Puchooa felt that he had been “fobbed off”.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal
- The background to this appeal is that Mr Puchooa has, since at least mid-2018, been concerned about anti-social behaviour ( “ASB” ) in the street where he lives. He entered into correspondence with va
- On 20 June 2022, in exercise of his rights under section 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 ( “FOIA” ), Mr Puchooa made a request to his local authority for certain information concerning the in
- On 5 May 2023 the Information Commissioner issued Decision Notice IC-199663-K9B6 (the “Decision Notice” ). In the Decision Notice the Information Commissioner accepted the local authority’s evidence t
- The permission stage
- The parties’ positions
- Why there was no oral hearing of this appeal
- Why I have allowed this appeal
- Conclusions