Aids and Unadapted Bath or Shower
Aids and Unadapted Bath or Shower
To put it shortly the Respondent’s submission is that an ‘aid’ cannot adapt a bath for the purposes of activity 4b. As observed by the Respondent there is no definition in the regulations of what ‘unadapted’ means. I can see the attraction in that submission given the task in question is whether a person needs an aid to get into and out of an ‘unadapted bath’. However, whether a specific aid, when employed, consequently modifies a bath or shower, thus adapting that standard bath is a question of fact. Some aids may adapt the bath, and some may not.
However, the fact that an aid has the result of adapting a bath is immaterial to the assessment of activity 4 descriptors. The starting point for descriptor task 4b is that the bath is unadapted, what then follows is the question whether the PIP claimant needs an aid to get into and out of that bath. If the claimant needs an aid to get into and out of the bath he is entitled to 2 points. The fact that the introduction of the aid, as a matter of fact, has the result of adapting the bath, is inconsequential for the purposes of assessing 4b in the light of the approach as set out at the beginning of this paragraph.
The descriptors for activity 4 are in ascending order of need. It is only necessary to consider whether a person requires supervision, prompting or assistance to get into and out of a bath, activity 4c and 4e respectively, if the claimant is unable to so with either an aid or appliance (4b). For reasons provided above, the starting position is the bath is unadapted and even if an individual requires an aid in conjunction with supervision, prompting or assistance to be able to carry out the descriptor tasks, the same staged process applies for the purposes of assessing 4c and 4e (see above).
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 3 July 2023 under SC154/23/00620 was made in error of law. Under section 12(2) (a) and (b)(i)
- These Directions may be supplemented by later directions by a Tribunal Judge in the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal
- First, whether a device can constitute an aid as defined in Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013 (“the Regulations”), in circumstances where the device is a structural feat
- I am grateful to the Respondent for the supplementary submissions which are directed to the above issues The general scheme of the Welfare Reform Act 2012 and the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013
- Interpretation under Regulation 2, Schedule 1, Part 1 of the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013
- Supervision, prompting and assistance
- Regulation 4(2A) of the Social Security (Personal Independent Regulations) 2013
- Regulation 4(4) defines these concepts as follows
- The provision under consideration in the present case
- The context in which the present issues arise
- The Findings of the First-tier Tribunal
- The Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal
- Grant of Permission to Appeal
- The Secretary of State’s argument on the unsupported ground of appeal
- Analysis and Reasons
- Aids and Unadapted Bath or Shower
- As applied to the facts as found in this appeal
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 450 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)