[2024] UKUT 450 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2024] UKUT 450 (AAC)

Fecha: 03-Jul-2023

The Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal

The Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal

31.

The Appellant appealed the decision of the FtT. The nub of his challenge was the alleged failure of the FtT to consider the functional impact of his chronic kidney disease (swelling of extremities) on his ability to carry out the PIP activities. FtTJ King refused permission, identifying that the FtT had referred to this condition and his urinary urgency ([6], [9] of the SoR). Judge King observed that the Appellant did not set out in his claim or in evidence that the swelling caused functional impairment.