Section 1
As the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error of law, it is SET ASIDE under section 12(2)(a) and (b)(i) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and the case is REMITTED to the First-tier Tribunal for rehearing by a fresh tribunal.
DIRECTIONS
The case is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration at an oral hearing.
The new tribunal should not involve any of the panel members previously involved in considering this appeal on 11 July 2023.
The new tribunal must not take account of circumstances that were not obtaining at the times the (then) Secretary of State made his decision on 24 November 2022 about whether LB had, or should be treated as having, limited capability for work: see section 12(8)(b) of the Social Security Act 1998 and R(IB) 2/04 at paragraph 188. Later evidence is admissible, provided it relates to the circumstances at the time of the decision: see R(DLA) 2/01 and R(DLA) 3/01.
When listing this appeal for determination before the new tribunal, the First-tier Tribunal is asked to note the following:
LB’s submissions to the Upper Tribunal state he wanted a face-to-face hearing of his appeal but it was listed for telephone hearing instead, which proved unsatisfactory; and
This appeal should not be listed for hearing and determination until after the Upper Tribunal issues and publishes its decisions in appeals UA-2024-000177-USTA (SSWP v SC) and UA-2024-000528-HB (MJ v (1) London Borough of Bromley and (2) SSWP).
If the parties have any further written evidence to put before the tribunal, this should be sent to the relevant HMCTS regional tribunal office within one month of the issue of this decision.
The tribunal hearing the remitted appeal is not bound in any way by the decision of the previous First-tier Tribunal. Depending on the findings of fact it makes, the new tribunal may reach the same or a different outcome from the previous tribunal.
Copies of this decision, the permission to appeal decision, and the submissions on behalf of both parties shall be added to the bundle to be placed before the First-tier Tribunal hearing the remitted appeal.
These Directions may be supplemented by later directions by a tribunal judge, registrar, or case worker, in the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal.
REASONS FOR DECISION
- Heading
- Section 1
- What this appeal is about
- Factual background
- Permission to appeal
- Legal Framework
- Deciding whether or not to stay LB’s appeal
- The Secretary of State’s position about LB’s appeal
- LB’s position
- Why there was no oral hearing of this appeal
- My decision
- Appeal ground at paragraph 10(b): procedural irregularity during the hearing
- Paragraph 10(a)(iii): referring to the Employment and Support Allowance Regulations 2008 in the Decision Notice and Statement of Reasons
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 132 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)