Heading

Appeal No. UA-2024-001058-PIP
Between:
CH
Appellant
- v -
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Scolding KC
Decided on consideration of the papers
Representation:
Appellant: Warwickshire Citizens Advice Benefits Service
Respondent: Mr R Naeem, DMA Appeals, Leeds
On appeal from:
Tribunal: First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber)
Tribunal Case No: SC222/23/00118
Tribunal Venue: Chesterfield Hearing Centre
Decision Date: 22 September 2023
SUMMARY OF DECISION
This appeal concerns procedural fairness and the approach that the Tribunal should take to the way in which it asks questions of those who are considered to be vulnerable. In particular, it cautions against asking “closed questions” to those who may find it difficult to elaborate on their answers to provide the Tribunal with the material needed. It also deals with issues of reasons and how Tribunals reach decisions
Keyword: Personal Independent Payment- general: Practice and Procedure
DECISION
- Heading
- Section 1
- What this case is about
- The claim
- The First Tier Tribunal
- Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Issues in the Appeal
- My conclusion on whether these matters amount to procedural unfairness
- Application of Regulation 4(2A) to the oral evidence in respect of PIP activities
- Adequacy of reasons
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 107 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)