[2025] UKUT 107 (AAC)

This case is about the approach to the questioning of an Appellant by the First-tier Tribunal when undertaking their inquisitorial role. I find that the mode of questioning did not enable the Appellant to participate fully and failed to follow up or clarify answers to questions posed. This case is also about whether the Tribunal correctly evaluated the evidence that it received. I find that the Tribunal did not correctly evaluate the evidence before them. This case also concerns whether the Tribunal gave adequate reasons for its decision. I find that it did not. Whilst the statement of reasons is extensive, it fails to say why it reached the conclusions that it did on some of the issues relevant and central to the appeal. The SSWP supports this appeal.