Application of the wrong test and failure to make findings as to whether the claimant can do so on over 50% of the days (rather than “for more than 50% of the time” or “for the/a majority of the time”
Application of the wrong test and failure to make findings as to whether the claimant can do so on over 50% of the days (rather than “for more than 50% of the time” or “for the/a majority of the time”)
The First-tier Tribunal materially erred in law in misciting the test in regulation 7 and in applying the wrong test. The test is not “for more than 50% of the time” (as the First-tier Tribunal said at paragraph 13), or “for the majority of the time” (as the tribunal said at paragraph 44), or “for a majority of the time” (as the tribunal said at paragraph 50). It is “on over 50% of the days of the required period”. While some First-tier Tribunal panels do sometimes miscite regulation 7 in this way (a hangover from previous legislation), it is not always a material miscitation. Here, however, it appears that the First-tier Tribunal’s application of “for more than 50% of the time” and of “for the/a majority of the time” could well have led it to reject any needs for activity 1 by imposing too high a bar: “on” a day is a lower test; it can be satisfied even if the descriptor is satisfied for less (indeed much less) than 51% of the day.
- Heading
- Mrs QWH’s appeal is allowed
- Factual and procedural background
- Appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- Late application to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Ground 3: activities 1, 2, 6 and 8
- Ground 3: toilet needs (activity 5)
- Ground 3: budgeting (activity 10)
- Submissions
- Law
- Activity 1: Preparing food
- I take each of those points in turn Failure adequately to consider and make a finding as to whether the claimant needs prompting to be able to prepare or cook a simple meal
- Adopting the HCP’s flawed findings
- Failure adequately to explain why the First-tier Tribunal found that the claimant had “for the majority of time, the…mental ability to prepare and cook a simple meal for one”
- Failure to make findings as to repeatedly, to an acceptable standard and within a reasonable time period
- Application of the wrong test and failure to make findings as to whether the claimant can do so on over 50% of the days (rather than “for more than 50% of the time” or “for the/a majority of the time”
- Activity 2: Taking nutrition
- Activity 8: Reading and understanding signs, symbols and words
- Ground 1 and dressing and undressing
- Disposal
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 339 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)