Conclusions
Disposal
We have come to the conclusion that some of the grounds of appeal have no merit and have dismissed them. However, we have also identified some mistakes of fact for the reasons set out above.
That being so, we thought about whether the mistakes of fact we have identified are such that they completely undermine the decision so that no other outcome but removal from the lists is permissible following our decision. We do not reach that conclusion. Whilst these mistakes of fact have been found as they are material to the ultimate decision, we have come to the conclusion that we will remit this matter to the DBS to make a fresh decision but direct that SS’s name be retained on both the Adults’ and Children’s Barred Lists whilst that decision is taken.
HHJ Simon Oliver sitting as a judge of the Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal Member Ms Josephine Heggie
Upper Tribunal Member Ms Suzanna Jacoby
Authorised for issue on 29 December 2024
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to remit this matter to the DBS to make a fresh decision
- The rule 14 Order on this appeal
- A brief summary of the background to this appeal
- Permission to Appeal
- The evidence
- The statutory framework
- The basis for a “relevant conduct” barring decision
- Rights of appeal
- The Case Law
- DBS referrals, investigation and decision to bar
- The Appellant’s case and Submissions
- The DBS case and submissions
- Conclusion of the Tribunal on the appeal
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 442 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)