Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2024] UKUT 443 (AAC)

Fecha: 01-Nov-2024

Heading

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

Appeal No. UA-2022-001795-V

[2024] UKUT 443 (AAC)

On appeal from a decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service

Between:

Appellant

- v –

The Disclosure and Barring Service

Respondent

Before: HHJ Simon Oliver sitting as a judge of the Upper Tribunal

Upper Tribunal Member Ms Josephine Heggie

Upper Tribunal Member Ms Suzanna Jacoby

Hearing date: 1 November 2024

Representation:

Appellant: Mr Khan S. Ehtesham Khan Lodi

Respondent: Mr Andrew Webster of counsel

ANONYMITY ORDER

On 5 May 2023, the Upper Tribunal made the following order, which remains in force:

“Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, THE UPPER TRIBUNAL ORDERS that:

No one shall, without the consent of the Upper Tribunal, publish or reveal the name or address of any of the following: (a) JE, who is the Appellant in these proceedings; (b) any of the service users mentioned in the documents or during a hearing; (c) the care assistant identified as JT in the papers; or any information that would be likely to lead to the identification of any of them or any member of their families in connection with these proceedings.

Any breach of this order is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and may be punishable by imprisonment, fine or other sanctions under section 25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The maximum punishment that may be imposed is a sentence of two years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine.”.

DECISION