![[2025] UKUT 021 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Events subsequent to the TC’s direction to revoke
Events subsequent to the TC’s direction to revoke
The appellant’s solicitors wrote to the TC on 4 January 2024 seeking reconsideration of the TC’s direction to revoke. This represented that the appellant did not appreciate (and had not been told by Mr Shilling) that Mr Shilling’s “meeting” with the TC on 11 December 2023 (as Mr Shilling described it in the document he signed on 4 December 2023) was in fact a public inquiry at which his good repute was at issue.
The letter said that the appellant had taken steps to identify a suitable alternative candidate for transport manager, Mr Braim, who was available and qualified; in the alternative, it asked for a public inquiry.
OTC responded on 5 January 2024, refusing the appellant’s requests, other than extending the date on which revocation would take effect, to 22 January 2024.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. We order that the direction of the Traffic Commissioner to revoke Norfolk Farm Produce Limited’s operator’s licence, conveyed in a letter of
- The revocation direction appealed against
- Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
- The Upper Tribunal proceedings in this case
- Background about the appellant
- Events leading up to the TC’s direction to revoke
- Events subsequent to the TC’s direction to revoke
- The appellant’s case in brief
- Was the TC’s direction to revoke wrong?
- The decision of the majority of the panel
- Summary view of the minority of the panel
- Conclusions