![[2025] UKUT 030 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion
We therefore conclude that the decision of the DBS to place DKS’s name on the adults’ barred list was not based on any mistake of fact and involved no mistake on any point of law. The appeal is dismissed, and the DBS’s decision is confirmed.
Thomas Church
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Ms Elizabeth Stuart-Cole
Member of the Upper Tribunal
Mr Matthew Turner
Member of the Upper Tribunal
Authorised by the Judge for issue on27January 2025
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service was not based on any mistake of fact and did not involve any mistake on any point of law
- Introduction
- Factual background
- The allegations
- DKS’s Written Representations
- The Barring Decision
- The criminal proceedings
- The ‘relevant conduct’ gateway
- The Upper Tribunal’s jurisdiction under the SVGA
- The relevant authorities
- The grounds of appeal and the parties’ submissions
- The evidence at the hearing before the Upper Tribunal
- Analysis
- Conclusions