Heading

Between:
DKS
Appellant
- v -
THE DISCLOSURE AND BARRING SERVICE
Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Church with Tribunal Members Stuart-Cole and Turner
Mode of hearing: Remote oral hearing by CVP
Representation:
Appellant: Mr Justin Hugheston-Roberts of counsel, instructed by Blackfords LLP
Respondent: Mr Tim Wilkinson, instructed by Ms EdithHolt of the DBS’s legal department
On appeal from: The Disclosure and Barring Service
Case No: 00934543671
Decision Date: 28 September 2021
RULE 14 Order
Pursuant to rule 14(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, it is prohibited for any person to disclose or publish any matter likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant in these proceedings. This order does not apply to: (a) the appellant; (b) any person to whom the appellant discloses such a matter or who learns of it through publication by the appellant; or (c) any person exercising statutory (including judicial) functions where knowledge of the matter is reasonably necessary for the proper exercise of the functions.
SUMMARY OF DECISION
SAFEGUARDING VULNERABLE GROUPS (65) Adults’ Barred List (65.2)
Judicial summary
This appeal is mainly about whether the DBS made a mistake of fact in finding that DKS had, while working as a Senior Carer at a care home, shouted and sworn at a resident who had soiled himself, and in finding that DKS had shouted at or spoken abruptly to, other residents and told residents that they use their buzzers too much.
It also raises an issue about whether the DBS made a mistake of law by failing to await the outcome of criminal proceedings arising out of the same allegations before making a final decision to place DKS’s name on the Adults’ Barred List.
We decide that the DBS’s decision involved no material mistake of fact or law and dismiss the appeal.
Please note the Summary of Decision is included for the convenience of readers. It does not form part of the decision. The Decision and Reasons of the judge follow.
DECISION
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service was not based on any mistake of fact and did not involve any mistake on any point of law
- Introduction
- Factual background
- The allegations
- DKS’s Written Representations
- The Barring Decision
- The criminal proceedings
- The ‘relevant conduct’ gateway
- The Upper Tribunal’s jurisdiction under the SVGA
- The relevant authorities
- The grounds of appeal and the parties’ submissions
- The evidence at the hearing before the Upper Tribunal
- Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 030 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)